I just read that Stonewall, the British gay rights
organisation, has given their annual Bigot of the Year award to a Scottish
cardinal for opposing gay marriage. This raises an interesting point.
A bigot is someone who holds an opinion based purely on
prejudice and not on reason, but that isn’t the case with the Cardinal. He is
not only a Christian but an officer of the Church, and the Church’s pre-eminent
document is the Holy Bible which explicitly forbids homosexuality and decrees
marriage to be a holy institution. Whether you agree with the Bible or not (and
it just so happens that I don’t) isn’t the point. The point is that, given the
context of the Cardinal’s professional position, his opposition to gay marriage
is entirely rational. In fact, I don’t see how he could possibly take any other
view and still justify his employment.
And whether or not you regard the Bible itself as prejudiced is also
beside the point, since the Cardinal didn’t write it; his job is to follow its
edicts.
What I find even more interesting is that Stonewall apparently
seem unable to acknowledge the Cardinal’s reasoning with regard to his personal
position on the matter. And that, ironically, means that it’s Stonewall who are
exhibiting bigotry, not the Cardinal.
No comments:
Post a Comment