‘You’re being pedantic,’ say the Canadians. ‘It’s only meant
to be a graphic representation of a maple leaf.’
So who’s right? I seem to recall that the Canadians describe
their flag as ‘A Canadian Maple leaf in red…’ Are they now covering their embarrassment
with a convenient excuse, or are the botanists being pedantic?
Oh for such matters of great import to keep our minds from
atrophying in the mire of mere trivialities. Such as, for example, Oxfam’s
assertion that the world’s richest hundred people (yes, just 100) have enough
wealth to end world poverty four times over. Though the detail might be
complex, I’m sure Oxfam have a valid point here. They’re asking that we
reorganise the way in which the world operates so as to achieve a better
balance between the masses who die of want, and the tiny minority who bathe in
senseless, unimaginable luxury. I think the wrong people are in charge to have any hope of
that happening, and maybe there’s a bigger picture to consider anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment