I just got back from the Hallowe’en barbecue and bonfire at
the village pub. It’s the first time I’ve spent Saturday night fully engaged
with the ethos of a den of strong drink and merriment since I last did voluntary
work at the theatre in 1997. A brief report:
The interior of the pub was done up as a facsimile of Castle
Dracula, albeit a plasticised version, with plastic cobwebs, plastic spiders
and… er… lots of other plastic things that I don’t quite remember. Why there
were no plastic bats I really don’t know, but there weren’t. And why the
children of the night (the barmaids) imagined that disturbingly skimpy bunny
girl costumes lent themselves to the ambience of a Transylvanian undead person’s
abode, I don’t know either. I just looked the other way and ordered a pint of
Marston’s Pedigree Ale. Twice.
The bonfire was big, but hardly attained the definition of
bigness established by my own single experience of building a public bonfire
back around 1994. It wasn’t quite as hot as I was expecting, and also didn’t
last as long. Nevertheless, it was a passable bonfire. And what was really
quite interesting were the little vortexes of swirling ash and dust that skipped
across the car park as though they had a life of their own. Failing to find an
explanation for them, I sought out a science teacher in the assembled multitude
and asked him. He couldn’t explain them either, so we settled on the likelihood
of them being frolicking sprites from an otherworldly source. He was actually
quite liberal as science teachers go.
But here’s the best bit(s)
I got talking to a pretty and personable young woman called
Julie, who is the daughter of the woman who lives at the last house before the
pub.
‘Are you the gentleman who lives up by the school?’ she
asked.
‘No. I’m the bloke
who lives up by the school. I’ve never been a gentleman.’
She seemed to like me, but I expect she’d just been taught
to be polite to older persons.
And then… and then… I got talking to the redoubtable
Christine, whose notoriety has made the pages of this blog before. Christine is
even older than me and has lived here all her life, so she knows everybody.
‘Somebody was asking me the other day,’ she began, ‘who that
strange man is who lives up by the school. He walks around the lanes all the time
and stares at things. (Trees, presumably.) I mean, a man who moves into the
village – on his own! I told her you’re
very intelligent and it doesn’t matter that you live alone.’
Well thank you, Christine. You made my day.
2 comments:
The 'barmaids' costumes would be fitting if Hugh Heifner were a vampire, lol.
'On his own' Less the shire and more Cranford, lol.
But Dracula has an erotic undertone. Bunny girl costumes are anything but erotic. 'Erotic' is about potential, not the cheaply explicit. OK, I'm odd.
I just worked out that if you take my house and the four closest to it, three are occupied by people living alone, and the other two by couples. What's interesting is that the other two 'loners' are women, so could it be that women living alone are acceptable because they're associated with potential vulnerability, while men living alone are associated with potential predation? That's an interesting thought.
Post a Comment