Well now, hang on a minute. The scourge to which the
government is referring is the prolific practice among young people of getting
well tanked up in town centre bars into the early hours of the morning, and
then staggering around the place behaving in a way that is somewhat short of
decorous. The problem here is that the price of drinks in pubs and bars is already
considerably higher than 40p a unit, so I’m not sure how they think it’s going
to make a difference.
And then there’s the more obvious point. Does this bunch of naïve,
out-of-touch airheads who currently pass for a government really believe that
young people will forego their most favoured form of recreation even if the price of drinks did go up a bit? No;
they’ll just grumble and pay the higher price.
I suspect, however, that the government is not being quite
so airheaded as they might seem. I suspect they know full well that it won’t
make any difference, but are indulging in the usual knee jerk reaction in order
to persuade the naïve, airheaded denizens of middle England
that the men in suits are doing something about a problem which said denizens
find disturbing. Which, of course, they’re not.
What this proposed minimum price would do, however, is make it that much more difficult for poorer
people to drink quietly and cheaply at home. That figures, since the present
government appears to be on a crusade to make life more difficult for poorer
people. Ex public schoolboys brought up in the Thatcher era don’t, I strongly
suspect, have a lot of time for poorer people, so I suppose it’s
understandable.
No comments:
Post a Comment