I suppose it could be said that I had an
effectively parentless upbringing. My stepfather provided for the material
needs, but he was no sort of a father figure in any deeper sense. My mother was
a good person and a good mother in many ways, and I don’t wish to detract from
her virtues, but she also had a pathological need to conform. All through my
childhood I was constantly told ‘don’t do this, or people won’t like you,’ ‘don’t
wear that, or people will stare at you,’ ‘take an apprenticeship when you leave
school, so you’ll always have a steady job,’ and the over-arching theme was
always ‘don’t take risks.’ No doubt it’s why I was more or less emotionally
independent of my parents by the time I reached my early teens. The need to
rebel against my stepfather’s cold, sociopathic nature and my mother’s
conformist one gathered pace until things came to a head when I was nineteen
and I left home for good.
What interests me, though, is this. How much of my
rebellion stemmed from the feeling that I was a square peg being forced through
a round hole, and how much from an inherent tendency to be rebellious? I
occasionally wonder – pointlessly, of course – how different things might have
been had I been brought up by a couple of far out Bohemians. Would I still have
rebelled and become an arch conformist? Would I now be living in a detached
house with five bedrooms and a Jacuzzi? Would I be changing my car for a new
one every two years and taking frequent long holidays in far-flung (though
always touristy) parts of the world? More to the point, would I be happier? What a
silly question!
But it does make me wonder just how much influence
the parenting style, as well as the relationship between parent and child, has
on a person’s future life. Is it a major factor, or do people eventually find
their own road irrespective of the stumbling blocks which even good parents can unwittingly put in their way?
No comments:
Post a Comment