The immigration issue keeps cropping up. Politicians keep
telling us that immigration has to be controlled for economic reasons. The
country simply can’t afford them, they say.
Well, it hasn’t escaped my notice that politicians seem able
to justify any amount of expenditure when it suits their personal or dogmatic
agendas. But, let’s leave that one aside. Maybe there are good economic reasons to control the level of immigration; I’m
not sufficiently conversant with high economic theory to argue the point. What
I have noticed, however, is this:
I’ve heard a lot of people down here at grass roots level
railing against immigrants and immigration, and they always trot out the
economic justifications. ‘These people are taking our jobs.’ ‘These people are
eating up our taxes by claiming benefits.’ ‘These people are just a drain on
the state.’
It’s that phrase ‘these people’ that interests me. As you go
further down the line of discussion, it becomes obvious that the complainer’s real
motivation isn’t actually economic at source. That argument is just the
politically correct cover. The real motivation is the continuing notions in
British society that:
1) Black and brown people are inferior to white people.
2) Non-English speakers are inferior to English speakers, or
at least those who have made the effort to learn the superior language to a
fluent degree.
3) Poor people are inferior to rich people.
4) Unemployed people are inferior to employed people.
5) Manual workers are inferior to those in brain-oriented
occupations.
And which side of those lines do the immigrants usually
fall? So then all this gets distilled down to the fundamental objection:
6) Allowing inferior people (as defined above) into our
country pollutes our culture.
It all comes down to pollution. I don’t quite see it that
way.
No comments:
Post a Comment