I was thinking about the bit of Zen wisdom quoted earlier,
and also about the definition of ‘contentment.’ The problem, it seems to me, is
that humans define it as ‘having the things we want.’ That means we see it as
an outcome of favourable external factors, rather than a self-contained state.
So what of the notion that God created a material version of
itself in order to experience low vibrational pleasures? It would follow that
the concomitant creation of the state of wanting would be essential to the
exercise. It would also follow that the route back to the Universal Godhead, or
whatever you want to call it, is to learn to stop wanting things – including contentment.
As I recall, the Gospels would have us believe that Jesus preached
just such an ideal. It’s one of those bits of Christian doctrine, along with
such things as turning the other cheek and the meek inheriting the earth, that most Christians
conveniently choose to ignore. And it’s one of the reasons why I suspect that Jesus
was actually preaching a radical new approach to spirituality based on Vedic
principles, and that the subsequent dilution of his message into a mere Judaic heterodoxy
augmented by the concept of Redemption has meant that two thousand years of Christianity
has been completely missing what he was really trying to teach.
But at least some of the carols have nice tunes. And I’m as
guilty of wanting things as anybody else.
2 comments:
I have reshared this on my Google plus stream. Below is a comment I got.
---------------------------
It seems to me that people make mistakes between cause and effect.
I mean everything we achieve in the material world and phisical events shouldn't be seen as causes, but effects of something inner that should be stable and trustworthy.
If this was true people wouldn't loose their minds when they couldn't keep control over what happens around them. And, it's important to say, there are many uncontroled events in everyone's life.
From this desperation in loosing control comes the hate for what is different, the basic disrespect for the Ethics itself.
(Paulo Meneghelli Júnior : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107264468314566203034/posts)
THank you, Mei-shan. There are so many subtly different ways of looking at the whole question of ego, and this is another one I braodly agree with.
Post a Comment