I’ve been musing this morning on a long post around the
equation:
Stability + Routine =
Stagnation
I know that I like having a stable base, I know that I even
like having a certain amount of routine for when I can’t be bothered to
explore, but it isn’t enough. Stagnation drives me to the laudanum or the opium
den.
And so I mused and mused, and it became ever more
complicated. Angles kept appearing that didn’t quite fit with any simple
resolution. I asked ‘If one achieves Enlightenment, where does one go from
there?’ The obvious answer to that question is ‘That’s the point at which I wouldn’t
want to go on exploring. I’d be content.’ Would I? I don’t know. And it occurred
to me that the Holy Grail isn’t anything tangible – palpable or otherwise – but
a state of mind.
And that brought me full circle to what I’ve said before:
that the ultimate goal of any individualised being is to cease being
individual. No more separation, no more ownership, no more being either object
or subject, no more first person pronouns. No more first person.
That made me a bit sad, so I stopped thinking about it. For
now, I need to embrace life if she’ll let me. I think there are a few more
revolutions of the wheel to experience yet, and I hope I’ll be able to enjoy
them, even though that statement probably sums up the very essence of the
entrapment. One day, no doubt, the light will go on and the bell will ping.
And so I didn’t write the long post around the equation.
Happy Christmas.
2 comments:
Interestingly, Maslow's vision of self-actualization isn't too different from this. People think he meant achieving enlightenment for yourself, but self-actualization was about being able to give back to others.
You're becoming very academic these days, young Sondule.
Go catch some snowflakes!
Merry Christmas, old friend.
Post a Comment