Helen’s change of name to Melanie has engendered some
discussion on the quality of darkness. Let me quote my favourite line from Poe again:
And Darkness and Decay
and the Red Death held illimitable Dominion over all.
This is true alliteration – not merely a coincidence of
initial letters, but the suggestion of an overall tone. It illustrates how we
in the west view darkness: as being associated with decay and death. We have a
tradition of burying our dead beneath the earth where they decay in darkness.
And we go further: we associate it with ‘evil.’ Light is the place of angels,
dark is the place of devils. It’s inherent in the Christian presumption of
duality.
But maybe it isn’t quite that simple. The colour of autumn
leaves is the colour of decay, a process which begins in the high branches closest
to the sun, and is completed on the ground in full daylight. And yet both
plants and animals have their genesis in dark places – the one under the earth,
the other in the womb. Even the Old Testament teaches that everything began
with darkness. Darkness is the place from which life flows.
So maybe there is no duality, but only an unbroken
continuum. Dark and light are essentially part of the same thing. It can be
argued that both plant and animal only prosper when they break through into the
light, but that’s no reason to dismiss darkness out of hand as something
inherently bad. If it’s the natural medium for genesis, maybe it’s also the
natural medium for rebirth when necessary. And maybe we all need some measure of rebirth now and then. In that sense, darkness is just as
positive as light.
It’s a complex subject, and like all subjects of a spiritual
nature, it eventually enters the realm of the unknowable where reason has no
dominion.
4 comments:
I'll say more later when i'm able, but for now here is one of my favorite quotations:
"Shadow owes its birth to light" John Gay
But is it the same principle? Shadow can only 'exist' at the light end of the continuum. Shadow is the denial of light, whereas darkness is the absence. It would be reasonable to argue that shadow is negative by definition, even though it can be useful and welcome at times to provide balance. Darkness, on the other hand, might be said to be one end of a wholly positive spectrum.
But this is the point at which I'm concerned that I'm getting into the realm of pointless semantics, which I suppose is why I hold philosophy and philosophers in limited regard. Maybe I'm wrong. Or lazy!
Darkness is the place, light returns to, to feel safe.
OK, I'll think on...
Post a Comment