It’s been a feature of my life – finding icons unconvincing,
especially when it comes to people. I could never, for example, find Chaplin’s
humour anything other than predictable and unfunny. I never found Marilyn Munroe
attractive; she always seemed to me to be covering rampant insecurity with
heavy layers of paint and the frenetic pursuit of indecorous behaviour. And the
worst of all was Elvis Presley. All I ever saw in him was a strutting, hopelessly
overcooked egomaniac who could sing a bit.
And then there are the TV soaps. Let’s face it: by and large
they’re badly written, badly directed and badly acted. And yet a very large
percentage of the population seem addicted to them.
I have tried to see what others see in these icons but I’ve
never got there, so it seems one of three explanations apply.
a) My tastes are simply out of step with the majority.
b) There’s something I’m missing.
c) Popular icons are usually created by third parties for
their own ends, and once an icon is made – justifiably or not – it becomes
self-perpetuating and the majority are taken in by it.
All three?
No comments:
Post a Comment