I think he’s probably wrong. I think an awful lot of people
would watch it out of a sense of curiosity. What I don’t understand is why
Ackroyd wants to do it, except to gross a few more million for the studio and
the top stars. I don’t believe it could ever be the third part of a true
Ghostbusters trilogy; it’s too far removed. The actors are thirty years older
now, so the characters would have to be thirty years older. That might make for
some interesting script and plot elements, but its connection with the
originals would be weak.
Ghostbusters stands tall as a cinematic icon consisting of
two films about some fit, thirty something parapsychologists-with-attitude
coming to the rescue of New York City in the greed-is-good eighties. It's
funny, exciting, imaginative, and even romantic. It's so different from
anything else that it remains almost as fresh today as it was then. A third one
now would have to be so essentially different in terms of character and
environment that it could only amount to a curio tagged on the end. I think it
would dilute the magic, and that would be a shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment