Did I say writer? That’s a different word. There’s a
general, if rather loose, axiom in the world of the scribblers that writers and
authors are fundamentally different creatures. The author belongs in the world
of entertainment, and the best selling
author is a leading light in that world (as well as probably being very well
off into the bargain.) The writer, on the other hand, belongs somewhere in that
ill-defined area to which the word ‘art’ is generally applied. The truism would
have it that whereas an author might make the reader’s eyes cry, the writer
should be capable of making their soul lament.
It is, as I said, a rather loose axiom. The likes of Kafka
and Flann O’Brien were clearly writers, and Agatha Christie was clearly an
author. Others – like Dickens, maybe – managed to straddle the demarcation line
and cause it to blur. Things are rarely clear cut, but I suppose it helps to
have some way of dividing those who write to entertain, and those who write for
a whole load of complex reasons that are both inward and outward looking. And
isn’t it interesting that both entertainers and artists often fall foul of
drink, drugs, and even suicide – the entertainers because they can’t stand the
pressures of fame, and the artists because they can’t stand the pressure of
heightened awareness?
My reason for musing on this isn’t to be snobbish; the
entertainer and the artist both have their place in the complex and
unfathomable business of life. It’s just that so many people don’t see the
difference between the two, and while the world heaps its material benefits
onto the head of the best selling author, the poor writer is often left to cry in
the wilderness.
No comments:
Post a Comment