This is a difficult one. I can certainly think of
circumstances in which the keeping of a minor promise would have consequences
so negative or injurious that the value of breaking it would far outweigh the
value of keeping it. In such a circumstance, reason would prevail in favour of
the former.
So does that mean a promise really is worthless, or does it simply
bring into question the nature of sanctity?
No comments:
Post a Comment