So now I want to know what it’s all about. I could, of
course, read the Introduction which will probably explain it to me in great
detail. The problem is that the Introduction is written by the same academic
who translated it, and not only do I have reservations about the quality of the
translation which doesn’t flow well, I also have reservations about the
role of the academic. With all due and genuine respect to certain persons I
hold in high esteem and who I know to be academically inclined, I still can’t
avoid the suspicion that much academic criticism and analysis is disingenuously
constructed to bolster their egos and their job prospects. I might well be
wrong. Feel free to excuse my ignorance on the grounds that I’m largely devoid
of formal education. You might well be right.
You see, I’d love to think that The Metamorphosis is simply a random outpouring of Kafka’s
idiosyncratic imagination. I don’t really want to be told that it’s an allegory
for the emergence of the beef burger as a staple of the western diet, or that
Gregor Samsa is Jesus in disguise. Some stories need to make a point,
obviously. Others can just be stories which touch a nerve in the human
condition, surely. The one observation I should like to make about this one is
this:
Kafka’s pronouncement of Gregor’s death is beautifully
understated and all the more poignant for so being. In fact, I think The Metamorphosis is possibly the
saddest story I’ve ever read.
Off to wash the dishes now, and then hopefully meet Lolita.
* * *
Somebody I met in the Shire yesterday told me I don’t look
well. ‘That is, not as well as the last time I saw you,’ she continued with
undertones of both urgency and apology. That made me feel a lot better.
2 comments:
I always thought that the Metamorphosis was about mental illness.
Maybe it is. It's just that I have the kind of mind which can accept a person turning into a bug overnight as being merely an interesting phenomenon.
The question I would have to ask is: Did Kafka say it was about mental illness? If he did, well and good. If he didn't, and if it is just an outpouring of his idiosyncratic imagination, would that tarnish his reputation as a great writer?
Post a Comment