But I don’t know. There were four suspicious deaths there
between 1995 and 2002. The army claimed they were all suicides, and the
inquests concurred. They included a young male soldier who had five gunshot
wounds to the head, and a ballistics expert argued that four of the shots came
from long range. He further argued that the death couldn’t possibly have been
suicide. But even if he was wrong about the ballistics evidence, the question
must surely be asked: how the hell does somebody shoot himself in the head five times?
A search of the web will turn up plenty of information on
the Deepcut Barracks affair, but there’s a brief resumé here.
Several police forces were involved in investigating the
deaths at Deepcut, but I gather they were all biased towards vindicating the
suicide theory. One force soundly criticised a previous force’s handling of the
investigation, but then the whole thing disappeared from the news pages and one
has to wonder why. Successive governments consistently refused demands for a
thorough, independent inquiry into the deaths, and now they have the perfect
excuse: It’s too long ago; memories will have
become weakened with time and therefore unreliable. This is a standard
cover-up tactic, and that’s what worries me.
We in Western Europe like
to believe that our respective Establishments are honest and transparent. We
like to think that cover-ups are the preserve of countries where oppressive
regimes operate on the basis that all’s fair in love, war and the maintenance
of power. (We associate them with America, too. Sorry Americans, but
you do have the CIA.)
Well, there’s enough evidence right here on the surface of
the Deepcut affair to strongly suggest that we might be sadly misguided.
No comments:
Post a Comment