(I put the EU bit in
because that’s what the BBC News people do. It’s completely unnecessary and a
bit irritating, but I do so like to follow established Establishment norms.)
Those very BBC News people were out and about today,
interviewing people about how they were likely to vote. I wish I’d been out and
about and got myself interviewed because I had my response all ready. Since I
didn’t, I suppose I’d better put it in writing instead, and I further suppose I
ought to use an appropriate style.
Yeah mate. Out in it. Wot
I think we shud do is put all these fukin foriners on a bunch of tranes goin
bak to fukin frogy land and then fil in our arf of the chanal tunal with conkreet.
Then we shud go to war with the frogs and crowts and ities and fukin daygos and
when weev beeten them we shud nook the hole of eesten urop cuz they aint worth
nowin in it. No wot I meen.
One woman who was
interviewed said she was undecided because she wanted to understand the
economic ramifications first. Was she kidding? This is complex High Economics we’re
talking about here. Even the high economists who went to university disagree on
the ramifications. Good luck, madam.
I think this is a gut feeling issue. I do, and my gut feeling
says stay in. I’ve come to quite like being European, even though I had doubts
at first. I’ve learned that some foreigners are nice people, and it takes me
one step closer to the Daming Palace at Xi’an.
No comments:
Post a Comment