No, I am.
I say that because I’m coming to the tentative suspicion
that the world of phenomenal reality – the world of mountains and murderers and
music and call girls and cows that burp methane into the atmosphere – is but a
contrivance, a stage on which the 7 billion real worlds can go about
constructing themselves. I am at the centre of one of those worlds, and in it
I’m the most important person.
(Isn’t it odd that this suspicion follows hot on the heels
of another suspicion that I’m not actually anybody, and neither is anybody
else? Is that a form of oxymoron? Maybe, but it sounds kind of smart if you
have the mind to see it that way. Sounding smart to a small minority is fun,
especially when they can’t answer back and put you right on what smartness is.)
So anyway, I’ve realised that this is why I prefer novels –
good novels – to textbooks. And who decides what qualifies to be called a good
novel? I do, obviously. The way I see it, textbooks only teach you about the
stage, whereas a good novel teaches you about the nature of the most important
person. That’s if you have the mind to let it, of course.
(I asked myself which novel taught me most about myself. It
was a tough one, but eventually I went for Lolita.
It taught me about worlds colliding and destroying each other. It brought out
my grief instinct. And as a little aside, Nabokov was the answer to two
different questions on University
Challenge tonight. He was the only thing that was. Coincidence, I suppose.)
I came by these pointless thoughts as my current reading
brought me close to the conclusion of A
Bend in the River. For all it’s lauded as a classic of modern literature,
I’ve found it mostly tedious. I realised that it’s because the world of the
protagonist and my world have nothing in common. There’s no overlap, so while
I’ve learned a bit about the stage – Africa in
this case – I haven’t learned anything about Me.
Maybe I should write another novel, all about the world in
which I am the most important person. The problem is, I still don’t know who I
am and probably never shall. And suppose I get to the end and decide that I’m
not anybody after all. Do I tear it up like a Buddhist sand mandala?
To conclude: The reason I’m wasting half an hour on a stream
of consciousness that will be of little or no interest to anybody else is that
I’ve had nothing to write to the blog for the past few days, at least nothing
I’d want anybody to read. Seems I still haven’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment