I posted about this when the ban was first brought in. Whilst my aversion to organised religion must be legendary by now, I fully respect everybody’s right to follow a religion and accord with its diktats as long as they’re not causing any harm. I simply don’t fall for the ‘security issue’ reason that is trotted out. That seems to me to be no more than a disingenuous excuse to cover religious and racial intolerance.
Now, I freely admit that the report I read was brief, and so a lot of the detail is missing. Nevertheless, one aspect of it raised a couple of interesting questions.
The French authorities said that the women weren’t arrested for wearing the veil, but for ‘taking part in an unauthorised protest.’ I have to ask, therefore:
1) Was everybody else taking part in this protest also arrested?
2) Am I to believe that protests have to be authorised in France?
I think that any further comment would be unnecessary, except perhaps to question just what the word ‘democracy’ means.
No comments:
Post a Comment