That question has presented itself again. ‘Who am I?’
Let’s turn it outwards. Let’s go and ask somebody ‘Who are you?’ They will tell you what their name is, where they live, what job they do, what their hobbies and interests are, their likes and dislikes, maybe even something about their personality traits. They might even claim to be religious and talk of going to heaven when they die. But that isn’t who they are, but what they are. It’s just their identity. Take all those things away by subjecting them to profound amnesia, and they won’t have a clue who they are. I once heard a profound amnesiac describe it in just those terms.
So the real question here is ‘What does “who” mean?’ I don’t know yet, but I’m reminded of Shakespeare’s famous line:
All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.
I think whoever wrote those words was on the right track. So do I want to go on life after life, merely playing roles in a succession of dramas? I suppose it’s the easy option, but sometimes it becomes a bit tedious.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Hmmm so when a religious person gets amnesia, would they still remember their faith?
If it's profound amnesia, Carms, I don't see how they could. Religious belief is indoctrinated. It strikes me as likely, though, that they would have a sense that there's 'something beyond.'
Funny, I just looked at the clock and worked out what time it is in Sydney. Time you were going to bed, young lady, after all your romcom exertions! And my role today is - Zebedee.
Oh Jeff I am sitting here with a soggy neck after my head exploded ;) I'll ponder on this one and pop back.
Zebedee ;)
With what will you ponder, dear Meal, dear Mela?
Needless to say, the first shouldn't have read 'meal!!!'
I often find the head rather confusing, I'll think with my gut on this one. Talking of meals ;)
We are who we imagine ourselves to be. There's a constant flux so and changing from one thought to the next. So, maybe were have no concrete who exactly.
Pondering and writing don't work for me, hence the "so and" that needn't be there ;)
Hi Mel. State of flux. Yes. Fundamental. So maybe we don't really exist as individuals, but are fragments of the universal consciousness temporarily occupying a construct of identity called 'me.' Incredibly convincing, though, isn't it?
Frighteningly so!!
Post a Comment