Each month when the moon moves into its third quarter and
then becomes a waning crescent, it’s always in the eastern sky when I go to
bed. We had a run of clear skies during the final phase of last month’s moon,
and so every night I saw it from my bathroom window moving ever further to the
north, sinking in the sky, and looking weaker and sicklier as each night passed.
Eventually there was no moon.
Over the past few nights the sky has been unremittingly
beset by a heavy cloud cover, and so the new moon hasn’t been visible. Until
this evening. At twilight I saw the moon again, already grown to a first
quarter and looking fresh, bright, and full of vigour through a clear patch in
the southern sky. And here’s what’s odd: for the first time in my life I was
quite forcibly struck by the fact that it was the same moon I had watched dying
just a week or so ago.
Why should I be suddenly so struck? I know, as we all do,
that there is only one moon (at least only one that is routinely visible.) And
yet there I stood, gazing in near-awe at a body that had been dead but had now
been resurrected into a new life.
My thoughts naturally turned to the process to which all
living beings are subjected: we’re born, we grow, we become strong and
functional, we perform our various and random acts, we experience the many
vicissitudes of good and bad fortune, and then we succumb to weakness and sickness
and eventually die. And so the moon is simply a metaphor for life.
Except it isn’t, not quite. Unlike the moon, we’re not
resurrected in the same body; and there are those who believe that we’re not
resurrected at all. I choose to suspect with some degree of confidence that they’re
probably wrong – we are resurrected, but in a different body. It’s a common
enough belief in many cultures and spiritual traditions, and it raises a simple
question:
Are we really the body in which we function for whatever
time we have in this version of reality – the one we see in the mirror every
day, the one to which we give a name, the one that feels pain when it’s
damaged, the one that struts and frets its hour upon the stage, the one to
which people say ‘do this, don’t do that; do as you’re told and you won’t be
punished’? Or are we something else entirely - a non-physical entity which might be more truly represented by what we call consciousness? I’m reminded of the forensic pathologist who said to her students:
‘The first thing to remember is that what you see on the slab is not a person.
The person’s gone.’ Quite, but gone where?
We don’t know, of course. Nobody does; it’s life’s ultimate
mystery.
But let’s for a moment accept that reincarnation (or the
wheel of life, death, and rebirth as the Buddhists prefer) is a fact as simply
understood. You cast off one body and then take up occupation in another
(possibly in the future or possibly in the past because time has no meaning in
worlds beyond this one – or so it is said.)
At this point my mind wanders off to consider another
possibility. Suppose there really are an infinite number of alternate
dimensions, a proposition which has now gained some respectability in
mainstream science. Might it not be that after death in one dimension we take
up another life as the same person in another? In other words, we carry on
being the same physical entity over and over again but in different parallel
universes? It would certainly explain the phenomenon of déjà vu, which I used
to experience a lot as a child and a teenager. Or maybe we have a choice in the
matter. Who knows?
And I know I’m not the first to propose this theory. Other
minds got there before mine (including JB Priestly, for example, whose ‘time
play’ An Inspector Calls is probably
the second best known, non-classical play after The Mouse Trap, and who also wrote the series of short pieces
called Outcries and Asides.) But I do
so love to muse on such unknowables. It’s probably why I never had any money.