One of my Christmas gifts from Mel this year was a copy of
the Rupert Bear annual. I might have mentioned in a recent post that the latest
Rupert Bear annual was always one of my favourite gifts as a kid, and so it's been
interesting to see what has changed since I last had one at around age ten or eleven.
Well, the artwork looks exactly the same, and the rhyming
couplets accompanying each panel sound about the same. And as far as I
remember, the stories follow the same lines. What’s changed is the character of
Rupert himself. Except, of course, it probably hasn’t.
Back in those innocent and relatively simple days of
childhood, Rupert seemed to me to be quite grown up in a childlike sort of way.
I identified with him. His mother, on the other hand, homely and comfortable as
she undoubtedly was, seemed a little remote.
Rupert has now become a child. He has a child’s mind and
speaks a child’s language. His mother is the one I relate to now. Given the
volume of experience which has passed under my personal bridge in the interim,
I suppose I should have expected it.
I said in a recent post that the principal delight in
reading Charlotte Brontë’s novel Shirley
lies in reading between the lines to discover the nature of Charlotte Brontë.
Over the past few nights I’ve come to realise that there is a quality to be
discovered by reading the lines themselves: she has the most marvellous and
mischievous sense of humour.
I never noticed it in her better known novels, Jane Eyre and Villette, yet here it is in all its glory. It’s a subtle, dry,
ironic sort of humour, sometimes softly stated and sometimes sharply. Who could
not, for example, fail to raise a smile at her choice for the heading of
Chapter XVIII:
WHICH THE GENTEEL READER IS RECOMMENDED TO SKIP, LOW PERSONS BEING HERE
INTRODUCED
I suspect that plenty of people would fail to raise a smile,
and that’s the beauty of it. It gives the impression of a cipher devised to be
intelligible only to those whose instrument of perception is tuned to the same
key. And that feels like a compliment to those of us who see her eyes so
clearly that we discern the glint in them.
I went for my Christmas Day walk before lunch today in order
to avoid having my steps constantly dogged by people wishing me a Happy
Christmas, thereby effectively forcing me into making a disingenuous response.
(I have observed down the years that most people take a walk
after lunch in order to ‘walk it off’,
and I’ve often wondered why people gorge themselves on Christmas Day until they
feel bloated and uncomfortable. Where’s the pleasure in that?)
But anyway, the fact is that I dislike making disingenuous
responses. If I were to be honest, I would say something like: ‘No thanks. I
don’t do Christmas.’ But then they would probably call me Scrooge, and sneer
and shriek and set their dogs on me, even if they paid obeisance to the spirit
of the season and delayed chasing me to the burning mill with pitchforks until
Boxing Day.
I do wish people would learn to understand Scrooge because
then they might realise that I am very nearly his antithesis. Why do so many
people think A Christmas Carol is
about correction, when it’s actually about rehabilitation?
But here’s the nice bit. During the whole progress of my
walk only one vehicle passed me and guess who was in it. Yup, the only person
domiciled within a 25 mile radius of here who I welcome seeing on Christmas Day. And being a passenger in a car,
she was unable to wish me a Happy Christmas. Perfect. (Actually she just might
know me well enough not to wish me a Happy Christmas, but as the aforementioned
Mr Scrooge says at one point in A
Christmas Carol – it’s the bit all the dramatisations leave out – ‘Excuse
me. I don’t know that.’)
So what does an ageing recluse, becoming ever more cynical
and tired of the daily round, do on Christmas Eve now that he’s remembered what
day it is?
Well, it’s turned cold outside tonight, and when it turns
cold outside it soon becomes cold inside. The first thing he does, therefore,
is sit on his hands at the computer so as to relieve them of some of the chill.
But while he’s doing that he’s unable to type or even read the next chapter of Shirley, and so he thinks. And after
he’s thought for a while he feels the need to write something in consequence.
Out come the hands and apply themselves to the keyboard.
One of his thoughts was about all the children who are
currently engaged in a troubled sleep – troubled only from the excitement of
knowing that tomorrow is Christmas Day, and that time is exasperatingly tardy
when Christmas Day approaches. Their resting minds know that the clock is
ticking and will eventually reach a point when they will be able to switch on
the light (for it will probably be early) and go in search of gay wrappings
hiding a multitude of pleasures. That was what he did as a child (in the days
before he became cynical and tired of the daily round.)
But then he thinks of the children in poor, or maybe
abusive, households who have no gay wrappings to search for. Do we still have
such children in these enlightened times? I think we probably do. And he thinks
of those who have lost loved ones to the pandemic, and who will be waking on Christmas Day to an
empty space probably for the first time in their lives. He thinks of those
shivering in feeble boats crossing dangerous seas for no better reason than to
escape violence, persecution and poverty, hoping that charity will prevail and
bring rescue. Christmas is, after all, supposedly about charity. But some of
them won’t even have a Christmas Day, now or ever again, because the deep sea will take them and relieve them of their misery. And what of those on terra firma who
have no walls to shield them from the cruel frosts of winter? How will they be
spending their Christmas Eve?
And that’s when he thinks that sometimes he would rather not
think at all, but stride carelessly across a sunlit meadow, his body replete with the
health, strength and vigour of youth, daring to do all that may become a man
(even though he's read that he who dares do more is none.)
His free bandwidth beckons at midnight, and then he will be
able to amuse himself with shallow pleasures beamed in from cyberspace while
the top of the scotch bottle begs to be loosened. And tomorrow will be another
(Christmas) day.
(And still he wishes everyone peace, joy and happiness.
Christmas should be no time for ghosts.)
Something odd just happened. For some reason – and I’m not
quite sure what – I felt impelled to listen to the Tony Bennett version of Stranger in Paradise that I posted on
yesterday’s blog. As soon as he began to sing the first line my conscious
shifted. I was a child again, not as a memory but as an actual presence. I was
back in the house I lived in between the ages of 1 and 11 – really back there,
looking around at the hazy outlines of walls and furniture. I felt sure that it
was Christmas and that my mother was in another room. It lasted only a few
seconds and then I returned to the here and now. I was trembling, my skin was
tingling, and I felt dizzy.
You will immediately conclude, of course, that this was
merely a psychological aberration, and you’d probably be right. We all know
that the mind is capable of producing all sorts of odd experiences which have
no basis in reality. But I also give much credence to Hamlet’s assertion that there are more things in heaven and earth… than
are dreamt of in your philosophy. And the message coming from the cutting
edge of physics appears to say: reality
is not quite what we think it is. Watch this space.
So what should I make of it? Is the universe – or one of its
agents – trying to tell me something? Is it right, as some claim, that all of
time exists at the same time, and that it is sometimes possible to shift to a
different groove in the vinyl and pick up an earlier or later state? Or am I
just a little closer to the edge of sanity than I ought to be?
We don’t know, do we? That’s the problem. All we can do is
let the experience remain a mystery and take its place in the treasure chest
along with all the others.
I’m sure there’s never been a year in my life when I was so
unaware of Christmas as I’ve been this year. I went for a walk at lunchtime, and
as I passed the village school I noticed that it was obviously closed. I wondered
why, and it was only after I’d worked out the date that I remembered that today
is Christmas Eve.
When I was a kid, Christmas Eve was the most magical day of
the year, even more so than Christmas Day. It was almost agonisingly swamped
with excitement and anticipation, and the feelings were re-lived when my
daughter was a little girl. Now I don’t even remember what day it is until
something prompts me.
So why is this? I’ve been increasingly lacking in Christmas
spirit for some years now, but never as much as this year. Is this the latest
manifestation of an ongoing process? Is it simply a matter of ageing? Is it to
do with becoming increasingly distant from the culture and its habits? Is it the increasing incidence of dark tunnels on my personal road? Is it
the strange and stifling atmosphere engendered by Covid?
I don’t know, but only remembering Christmas Eve after being
prompted half way through the day still came as a surprise. And given my
enhanced awareness of mortality since the cancer issue, I wonder whether I will
have the chance to find out what my response to Christmas will be next year.
I talked in some recent posts about the writing of a new
short story. It has now been posted to the other site.
It makes no claim to quality, having been written hurriedly
on a whim over a few evenings when the constraints of current conditions
weighed heavy. I worked out today (in furtherance of my fascination with
statistics) that during the various versions of lockdown since the early
spring, I have spent approximately 96% of my time alone in the environs of my
little plot. Lately, since the winter has begun to bite, it has been mostly spent
within the four walls of a damp and draughty croft.
Such a situation can wreak mild, but not infrequent, havoc
on the nervous system even for a recluse like me, and the writing of an
inconsequential little tale was a welcome expression of fancy, and also a
useful aid to the maintenance of sanity.
And those with an ear for the nuances of language might have
noted that recent posts to this blog have offered faint echoes of the
mid-Victorian style. That is to be expected since I have fallen under the spell
of the Misses Helstone and Keelder in the novel Shirley. Such is not, however, the case with the story.
I asked myself a question yesterday (I have no idea why, but
I did.) It ran something like this:
‘If you were asked to list your favourite romantic ballads,
which would they be?’
No problem. Three stand out, and three YouTube clips are
appended in the order in which they took root in my consciousness.
So the next query was:
‘What do these three songs say about you vis-à-vis the
position of the fairer sex in the progress of your life to date?’
Well, the first of them stems, I’m quite sure, from a time early
in my infancy when I saw the film Kismet (from which this song is taken).
This is interesting because it suggests that my predilection for the Romantic
(rather than the lower case romantic) was established long before I was capable
of rationalising the combination of lovelorn lyrics and Borodin’s ravishing
melody. In fact, it was even before I could write, much less be able to spell
‘enchanting.’
The second came a bit later. I was still very young, and yet
the tenor and verbal nuances were already obvious to me. But then, I do
remember the school nurse saying to my mother on one occasion: ‘It’s surprising
how early some boys develop.’ (I didn’t quite know what she meant at the time,
but I took it as a compliment anyway.)
The third came along in mid life when I had undertaken not
to engage in further romantic dalliances because people were getting hurt. It
brings to mind two particularly lovely pieces of passion fruit which I felt had
to be left on the tree for others to enjoy. Dear old karma finally caught up
with me and it was my turn to suffer. Such is life, and it’s all over now, Baby
Blue (as I do so like quoting when I feel inclined to use somebody else’s words
for a change.)
A sound bite stepped into my head this morning and asked
whether it might be granted an airing on my blog. I said I’d think about it,
and so I have. I decided to accede, with the proviso that all sound bites –
whoever claims their genesis and however wise they might appear to the
undiscerning acolyte – are generalisations which might be tolerated and
accorded a due place in the canon, but never relied upon. This was it:
A promise made in the
throes of romantic entanglement is the most likely to be earnestly meant, but
the least likely to be vigorously kept.
What I don’t know is whether the author of this sentiment
was guided by observation, personal experience, or congenital cynicism.
I just realised why the elderly become so sedentary in their
habits and activities, so torpid as to be almost unmoving. It’s because lively activity
makes time slip by quickly, and when you perceive your time to be short, the
urge to wring substance out of every second becomes seemingly important.
Recently received intelligence informs me that the sack of
deleterious prospects for the new year and beyond continues to grow heavier,
and so the persistent drip of anxiety is quickening.
Where have all the flowers gone? Where the sunlit company of
the inestimable Lady B? Where the means to sit and observe some random minutes
of the meandering steps of random strangers? Where the bright and mellow mornings when I
was content to start another day? Where the inspiration to commit my own mental
meanderings to the vastness of cyberspace?
Darkness rules now. Covid is the only headline. Warnings,
restrictions and impediments block the view ahead. Risk is the watchword of the
hour, and reluctance its dedicated bedfellow. And while the spirit feels
cabined, cribbed and confined, the leaden sky continues to glower, disgorging
its cargo almost daily to swamp the torpid landscape with wetness, filth and
the detritus of decay.
***
But at least I have Charlotte Brontë and her Shirley to provide a little blessed
relief. I’m about a third of the way through it now (much of the prose style is
heavy and complex, and so requires a high degree of concentration) and am
becoming engrossed for a most unexpected reason: I’m learning – or think I’m
learning – an awful lot about Charlotte Brontë. I’m sure it’s the only book
I’ve ever read in which reading between the lines is more engaging and
enlightening than following the plot. There isn’t an awful lot of plot to follow so far.
I’m currently reading Charlotte Brontë’s second published
novel, Shirley. It’s a tough read in
some ways, lacking as it does the surface charm of Jane Eyre and Villette,
and replacing the more accustomed whipped cream prose with something harder but
no less compelling – let’s offer a mature blue Stilton cheese by way of
attempting comparison. The plot is not lacking in romantic interest, but there
is no urbane delicacy or bucolic charm in the background. This story is set at
a time of civil war during the Industrial Revolution between the men of
business and their impoverished workers, when the mill owners' machines were
being smashed and their bodies sometimes beaten, and when the starving peasants
were having degradation, deportation, and even death added to an already
desperate existence.
But that’s not why I’m writing this rare blog post. I’m
writing it because the chapter I read tonight concerned two elderly spinsters –
the Misses Mann and Ainley – who are both somewhat physically impoverished and
therefore mocked by the bright young things of the time, but in both of whom
shines the light of charity and selfless dedication to the cause of humanity and
its needs.
And yet what mainly interested me was not the two ladies’
inner qualities, but the fact that Charlotte
referred to them unequivocally as ‘old maids.’ Would a modern writer use that
term? I doubt it. And my questioning went further to consider whether there is
a male equivalent of the ‘old maid’, and if there is, whether it should be
allotted to me. My domestic circumstances bear close comparison with theirs,
even though the times are so different.
But let’s return to the inner qualities for a moment. I
compared mine with theirs, and was reminded of how I sometimes long for some
comely young wench to bestow on me the kindness of approbation – only
approbation, you understand, nothing more – and wondered whether this
encapsulates the difference between the selfless old maid and the selfish
ageing gentleman. I concluded that it probably does.
(And might I add that the walls of the dark tunnel are still
largely blocking the signal which used to flow from my blog, and simply said
'write.')
The tunnel I’ve been stumbling through for the past couple
of weeks must be getting a bit lighter because I finished my new short story
tonight. It probably needs one more edit and then it can go up at the other place.
And I’m currently engaged in what might be termed a ‘discussion’
with somebody on YouTube over the matter of the vilification of King Henry
VIII. I’m determined that it should not descend into acrimony because that
would not accord with my new-found desire to be a better person. His stupidity
irritates me, certainly, but it shouldn’t. I have no right to be irritated by
another person’s stupidity because it’s his to own and none of my business as
long as a third party isn’t involved. (That’s one way in which Gregory House
and I differ. Did I say I was watching some old House episodes again? I am.)
I did think of pulling out of the discussion because a
stupid person isn’t going to stop being stupid just because I make a rational
point. But then I decided that if I can encourage even one YouTube comment
reader to be more judicious in considering whether it is reasonable and just to
judge a historical figure on the basis of current sensibilities, there was a
reason to continue. And so I did.
(And now I feel indefensibly arrogant for saying such a
thing. You can’t win in the matter of being a better person, can you? I think I’ll
say ‘hang the cholesterol’ and have a piece of cheese. Cheese is the one thing
I really miss in my undertaking to imbibe less cholesterol.)
Some of the regulars out there (my Blogger stats indicates
that there are regulars out there)
might be wondering why I haven’t written anything to the blog for ten days.
Well, I expect they already know because it’s a simple matter of ‘here we go
again.’ Those same regulars will have noted, no doubt, that my life path
frequently passes through dark, dank, dispiriting tunnels of varying lengths, and
at such times I lose the will to do what I really want to do which is make blog
posts.
This time is different. This time I’ve lost even the desire to
make blog posts. The blog has come to seem irrelevant and therefore
unimportant, which is a shame because it’s been my sole regular companion for
nearly eleven years. It’s been my outlet for all the musings, observations,
dark and light thoughts, general silliness, the relation of incidents interesting
and uninteresting, grumbles galore, and all the other stuff which goes to make
up the creature my consciousness is currently inhabiting. To lose it,
therefore, would be a matter of some consequence.
But if it has to be, it has to be. Everything in the
phenomenal universe is in a state of flux so why should my little blog be an
exception? Then again, maybe it won’t. The fact is that I never quite know who
I shall be the next time I emerge from one of the dank, dark, dispiriting
tunnels. Maybe the urge to communicate will return and I will once again rise
to take up the tools and verbal weapons necessary to do so. It might be
tomorrow or next week or never. That’s all I can say. It’s called ‘going with
the flow.’
But now I feel that I’m becoming too self-indulgent for my
own comfort so I’m going to shut up. Do keep watching this space if you feel so
disposed, or not if you don’t.
(And perhaps I should mention that two rather lovely horses
came to greet me over the top of a field gate today. It was most gratifying, so
now I have.)
I've never had money because I've never been driven by money. I received little formal education beyond the age of sixteen, which isn't such a bad thing since you get a different angle on life that way. Learning what you want and need to learn often reveals things that the system's road keeps hidden.
Anyone interested in viewing the availablity of my novel Odyssey or novella The Gift Horse can do so here.
To Be Retained...
...until death do re-unite or the Priestess return to Avalon.
Khalil Gibran on Children.
You may give them your love but not your thoughts, for they have their own thoughts. You may house their bodies but not their souls, for their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you. For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.
OMAR KAYYAM ON REGRET.
The moving finger writes and, having writ, moves on. Nor all your piety nor wit shall lure it back to cancel half a line, nor all your tears wash out a word of it.
Herman Hess on Nobility
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. True nobility lies in being superior to your former self .
Free Fiction
I have another blog called A Handful of Stories on which I've posted some of my short fiction. Most of it has been published by a variety of independent small press publishers, so somebody other than me must have thought it worth reading.
All the permanent pictures and some of the posted ones on this blog are my copyright. Most of them, however, are placed with a picture library which holds the licensing rights. I don't, therefore, have the legal right to grant permission to use them.
An Inhabitant of the Hungry Ghost Realm
This character appears in one of my short stories, and also in the novel. He's sadder than he looks, poor thing.